Trust

Which numbers, from where?

Our emission factor sources, the versions we pin, and — openly — where our data is still thin.

The factor choice is part of the result

Two firms can report very different numbers for the same product and both be defensible, because source, geography, year, system boundary and calorific basis all move the answer.

That is why the choice is recorded rather than merely applied: every calculation stores which factor, at which version, from which source produced the figure. A question about methodology has a stored answer.

A versioned, checksummed catalogue

Core factors live in a versioned catalogue with recorded provenance and checksums, so a factor update is a deliberate, dated event rather than a silent change — and past reports remain reproducible against the version they used.

Where the uncertainty concentrates

Not every figure in an inventory is equally solid, and rather than hide that we measure it. The tightest end is Scope 1 and 2 resting on signed meter readings: there the uncertainty is that of the instrument and the grid factor. The widest end is Scope 3 lines estimated from spend: a factor that converts money into emissions is a sector average, and it does not know your supplier.

That is why a calculation returns a number plus an error band, and the band comes from the method itself. When measured supplier data arrives the band narrows and where it came from goes on the record — the moment an estimate is replaced by a measurement becomes visible. Even where supplier data is anchored, its own uncertainty is carried through: an anchor does not make a number certain.

We also record separately where the data came from — a signed instrument reading, a source document, or a declaration. This is an axis SEPARATE from "who verified it": a figure that has passed independent assurance may rest entirely on hand-entered data.

Evidence provenance: same number, three levels of reliability

You do not have to take any of this on trust

The only meaningful test of everything above is this: can you take a figure and recompute it yourself? That is what the verifier is for — it recomputes the hashes and the Merkle path in your own browser. No account, no API key, no need to trust us.

Verify a record

Frameworks and sources

GHG Protocol

Scope 1, 2 and the full 15 Scope 3 categories.

ISO 14064 / 14067

Organisational inventories and product carbon footprints.

EU CBAM

Embedded emissions in the EU reporting structure.

SBTi

Target pathways and progress tracking.

IPCC AR6

Global warming potentials, with AR5 conversion available.

PACT data model

Pathfinder ProductFootprint shaped export.

Versioned catalogue

Core factors checksummed and version-pinned for reproducibility.

National and sector factors

Country grid factors and sector reference intensities.

FAQ

Our customer asked for an LCA. Is a carbon footprint enough?

Often they mean a product carbon footprint and use "LCA" loosely. Sometimes they mean a genuine multi-impact assessment, and occasionally they mean a verified EPD, which is a different exercise again.

It is worth asking which of those they need before producing any of them. The comparison page sets the four side by side for exactly this conversation.

Can you produce a full multi-impact LCA today?

Not today. The multi-impact engine is built, and carbon runs on it in production. What it lacks is a licensed inventory database covering water, acidification, eutrophication and resource use to the standard a real assessment needs.

We would rather say that plainly than produce a multi-impact number we cannot source.

Where do your emission factors come from?

From published datasets, and every factor carries its source and year into the result. The free calculator on this site uses a 43-factor catalogue derived from the audited catalogue in the platform, with the version stamped on the output.

Some entries are weaker than others — an ageing polyester factor, some without a redistributable licence — and those are flagged rather than quietly averaged in.

Questions we are actually asked →

Make your carbon data impossible to doubt.

Join forward-looking companies turning emissions into verifiable, audit-ready proof.

Request a demo